ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2026
Effect of Different Sealers and Irrigants on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to The Root Canal.
Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the effects of bioceramic and resin-based root canal sealers and different irrigation protocols on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of fiber posts. Methods: Fifty-four freshly extracted mandibular canines were instrumented and irrigated with NaOCl and EDTA. The specimens were first divided into two groups based on the sealer used: a bioceramic sealer (Bioserra) or a resin-based sealer (AH Plus) (n=27 per group). Each group was then randomly subdivided into three subgroups (n=9) based on the irrigation solution used for smear layer removal during post space preparation: distilled water, 17% EDTA, or 0.2% chitosan. Fiber posts were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Sections (1.5-mm thick) from the coronal third were subjected to a push-out bond strength test. Data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests (α=0.05). Results: Both the type of sealer and the irrigation protocol significantly influenced PBS values ( Conclusion: Root canal sealer type and irrigation protocol during post space preparation significantly affected the bond strength of fiber posts. Chitosan irrigation demonstrated superior performance, suggesting its potential to improve post retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.