ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2026
Analysis of Lip Pressure and Quality of Life Following Gummy Smile Treatment.
Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A gummy smile is an aesthetic condition that can negatively impact self-esteem and quality of life. This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the effects of gummy smile treatments with botulinum toxin type A and/or hyaluronic acid on lip pressure and the perceived quality of life in adult individuals. Methods: Thirty adult individuals aged 18‒65 years, with>2 mm of gingival exposure when smiling, participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to three groups: botulinum toxin (n=10), hyaluronic acid (n=10), and a combination of both (n=10). Lip pressure was measured using the Biofeedback Pró-Fono device at baseline and 15, 30, 90, and 180 days after the procedures. Quality of life was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, which was applied 15 days after treatment. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and t-tests ( Results: All the groups showed variations in lip pressure over time, with a gradual increase up to 180 days and statistically significant differences. Intergroup comparisons across time intervals were not assessed. All three groups showed improvements in the quality of life, with the combined treatment standing out. Conclusion: Aesthetic treatments for gummy smile resulted in significant changes in lip pressure over time and were associated with improvements in the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.