ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2026
Optimized Analysis of Cervical Vertebrae Maturation in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans are widely used in dentistry as a valuable and accurate research tool for assessing skeletal age. This study aimed to conduct an optimized analysis of cervical vertebrae maturation using pre-existing CBCT images and compare the findings with mandibular growth stages. Methods: Seventy-five participants evaluated 24 CBCT images, from which 12 lateral cephalometric projections (Cef2D) and 12 sagittal tomographic reconstructions (Rec2D) were extracted. The inferior borders of the C2, C3, and C4 vertebrae, as well as the shapes of C3 and C4, were analyzed according to the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method proposed by Baccetti et al. (2005). The degree of reproducibility was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: The analysis of intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility for the inferior borders of the cervical vertebrae and the classification of maturation stages showed almost perfect and substantial levels of agreement, respectively. These results were consistent for both Cef2D and Rec2D images. When mandibular growth stages were grouped, the reproducibility of the CVM method also reached an almost perfect level of agreement for both image types. Conclusion: The analysis of CVM, adapted from the method by Baccetti et al. (2005) for CBCT, demonstrated a high level of reproducibility, particularly when evaluating the inferior borders of the C2, C3, and C4 vertebrae and when grouping post-peak stages of mandibular growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.