ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2026
Towards a Contextualized Social Vulnerability Index: Defining Key Domains and Indicators for Iran's Health System.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social vulnerability is an inherently context-dependent concept that has recently gained increasing attention within the framework of the social determinants of health. This study aimed to define and conceptualize social vulnerability within the specific context of Iran. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods design was employed. An initial pool of indicators was systematically developed through a literature review. The Delphi consensus technique was used to conceptualize social vulnerability in Iranian society by identifying context-sensitive and culturally relevant indicators. Over six months, 23 national experts in health and social welfare participated in three rounds of discussions. To assess the relevance and importance of these indicators, statistical indices, including the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation, were applied. A directed qualitative content analysis was conducted to systematically categorize the indicators into distinct dimensions. Results: Experts identified 65 relevant indicators of social vulnerability. Indicators with the strongest consensus included families living below the poverty line, the unemployment rate, the ratio of marginalized populations, the number of malnourished individuals, people lacking social insurance, the share of housing costs, the number of out-of-school children, the proportion of food expenses in total household spending, education levels below a diploma, and the under-five mortality rate. The ten identified dimensions of social vulnerability in Iran were: Populations at Risk; Family and Gender; Economic; Health Infrastructure and Public Health; Education; Housing and Built Environment; Transportation and Mobility; Crime and Social Security; Emergency Response and Disaster Preparedness; and Social Capital and Institutional Support. Conclusion: In developing countries such as Iran, social vulnerability is strongly influenced by macroeconomic fragility, governance constraints, and cultural factors. Developing a robust, context-sensitive framework for conceptualizing social vulnerability provides a foundation for practical tools to assess and monitor vulnerability more effectively. Ultimately, this approach supports targeted interventions aimed at improving the social determinants of health and enhancing population well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.