ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Teacher-regulated generative AI support, student agency, and perceived learning gains in higher education: the moderating role of perceived fairness.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly used in higher education, yet its educational value depends not only on technological access but also on how its use is pedagogically regulated. This study examined how teacher-regulated generative AI support is associated with university students' perceived learning gains in higher education. It further tested whether student agency mediates this association and whether perceived fairness conditions the strength of the association between teacher-regulated generative AI support and student agency. Methods: We adopted a cross-sectional quantitative survey design and collected data from 428 university students from six universities in western China who had used generative AI in course-related learning tasks under teacher guidance and within teacher-defined expectations. Structural equation modeling was used to test the direct and indirect associations in the proposed model, and a manifest interaction analysis was used to examine the first-stage moderation effect of perceived fairness. Results: In the proposed model, teacher-regulated generative AI support was positively associated with perceived learning gains both directly and indirectly through student agency. Student agency was statistically consistent with a mediated pathway linking teacher-regulated generative AI support to perceived learning gains. In addition, perceived fairness was associated with a stronger positive relationship between teacher-regulated generative AI support and student agency. Discussion: These findings suggest that students reported greater learning benefits when generative AI use was guided more clearly by teachers, taken up more actively by learners, and experienced in a fairer learning context. The study therefore highlights student agency as one plausible pathway linking teacher-regulated AI use to perceived learning gains in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.