ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Evaluating the detection of small brain lesions in magnetic resonance using deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Detecting brain lesions using Artificial Intelligence methods has been a focus of prior research, with numerous datasets supporting this task to improve clinical results. However, evaluation metrics and reported results often summarise overall performance without considering variations in lesion size. In clinical practice, the detection of small tumours is particularly critical for early diagnosis and treatment effectiveness. Methods: This study evaluates the performance of Artificial Intelligence models on established datasets with a specific focus on lesion identification and lesion size. We introduce a novel Deep Learning model tailored to detect small brain tumours in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, integrating a clinically defined "small tumour" concept into both the training and evaluation processes. Results: The proposed approach demonstrates robust performance, achieving loss values ranging from 1.5 to 11.1 and Dice Scores between 96.3% and 98.1% across multiple datasets. Discussion: The main contribution of this work is the incorporation of clinically meaningful lesion-size information into model development and assessment. These findings suggest that explicitly considering small tumours can improve the clinical relevance of Artificial Intelligence systems for brain lesion detection and support earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.