Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516536›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Return-To-Work and Working Status After Surgery for Gastric and Esophageal Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study.

Kentaro Goto, Shigeo Hisamori, Kohei Ueno, Hiroyasu Abe, Ryosuke Okamura, Hisahiro Hosogi, Yoshito Yamashita, Dai Manaka, Hiroaki Hata, Tatsuto Nishigori and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kentaro GotoDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2805-3226
Shigeo HisamoriDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0163-6978
Kohei UenoDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-2950
Hiroyasu AbeDepartment of Regulatory Science and Pharmaceutical Informatics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1526-7143
Ryosuke OkamuraDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-8621
Hisahiro HosogiDepartment of Surgery Osaka Red Cross Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-6139
Yoshito YamashitaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center Wakayama Japan.
Dai ManakaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto-Katsura Hospital Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7033-4298
Hiroaki HataDepartment of Surgery National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center Kyoto Japan.
Tatsuto NishigoriDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Kyoto City Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Sanae NakajimaDepartment of Surgery Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Michihiro YamamotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Tenri Yorozu Hospital Nara Japan.
Koichi KinoshitaDepartment of Surgery Japan Baptist Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Shintaro OkumuraDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-4101
Masazumi SakaguchiDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Shigeru TsunodaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1468-7352
Yu SakagamiOccupational Welfare Division, Agency for Health, Safety and Environment Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-8587
Koya HidaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-7075
Kazutaka ObamaDepartment of Surgery Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-6701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: As survival after gastric and esophageal cancer continues to improve, sustained work participation has become an important survivorship outcome. We aimed to evaluate return-to-work (RTW) rates 18 months after curative-intent surgery for gastric and esophageal cancers and to identify clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with delayed or failed RTW. Methods: This multicenter, longitudinal, prospective cohort study evaluated working-age Japanese patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for gastric or esophageal cancer. Working status was assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was working status at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included time to first RTW, and factors associated with non-working and delayed RTW. Exploratory analyses evaluated 6-month patient-reported outcomes (QLQ-C30) and postoperative weight loss. Results: Among 158 eligible patients, 124 (78.5%) were working at 18 months. Older age (≥ 65 years) and pathological stage≥ III were associated with non-working at 18 months, whereas sedentary work and self-employment were associated with a lower risk of non-working. Postoperative appetite loss, financial difficulties (QLQ-C30), and ≥ 10% body weight loss at 6 months were associated with non-working status. Median time to first RTW was 30 and 70 days for gastric and esophageal cancers, respectively. Esophageal cancer and advanced stage were consistently associated with delayed RTW, with weaker evidence for associations with female sex and preoperative retirement. Conclusions: Approximately 80% of patients were working at 18 months after surgery. Postoperative nutritional impairment and symptom burden were associated with long-term work participation and may help identify patients at risk of not working after surgery.

Indexed as

cancer survivorshipgastroesophageal cancerhealth‐related quality of lifepatient‐reported outcomesunemployment

Identifiers

PMID42516536
PMCPMC13402095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.