ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
The social phenomenon of rare diseases: a logical-modal analysis.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the social phenomenon of rare diseases through a logical-modal analysis. Although rare diseases originate within a biomedical framework and are increasingly recognised by institutional and empirical literature as issues of equity, inclusion, care and participation, this recognition has not usually been formalised in Durkheimian terms. The study applies modal logic, based on possible-worlds semantics and Kripke models, to clarify the conditions under which rare diseases acquire the status of social facts. By modelling behavioural change, coercion, generality and existence independent of individual manifestations, it shows how rare diseases transcend isolated clinical cases and impose structured constraints on social roles, families, institutions and policies. Empirical illustrations from international policy, employment studies, caregiver research and participation surveys are used to anchor the modal variables without treating the model as a statistical validation. The analysis argues that the transition from fragmented recognition to consolidated social fact depends on collective action, institutionalisation and normative recognition. The formalisation identifies intermediate configurations and a stabilised threshold state in which rare diseases become durable and socially binding within the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.