ArticleCureus2026
Expert Perspectives on Developing Mixed Reality Software for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Management: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common peripheral vestibular disorder, yet its management often varies due to inconsistent maneuver execution and clinician training. Mixed reality offers potential to standardize procedures and enhance user guidance. This study explored expert perspectives to inform the development of mixed reality software designed to facilitate the diagnosis and management of BPPV.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 17 clinicians with experience in vestibular care. Participants completed a structured online questionnaire containing open-ended items, and responses were analyzed thematically to identify key design priorities and safety considerations.
resultsThematic analysis identified four major domains: Essential Clinical Features, Functional Enhancements, Perceived Adverse Effects, and Implementation Considerations. Experts highlighted the need for step-by-step procedural guidance, angle-specific head and body measurements, visual and interactive aids, and tools for nystagmus detection. Potential adverse effects, including eye strain, vertigo exacerbation, and nausea, were also emphasized. Implementation priorities included high-definition display quality, lightweight hardware, affordability, and ease of use.
conclusionExpert feedback underscored the need for mixed reality systems that prioritize procedural accuracy, usability, and safety. These findings provide an expert-informed framework for a user-centered mixed reality prototype that can be refined and evaluated in future clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.