ArticleCureus2026
Precision Prescribing in the ICU: Evaluating BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel and Standard Culture-Guided Therapy for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in ICUs. Timely identification of pathogens is critical to initiating targeted antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluated the clinical and diagnostic impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (BFPP; BioFire Diagnostics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA), a rapid multiplex PCR-based test, compared to conventional culture and sensitivity testing in patients with VAP.
methodsA prospective observational longitudinal study was conducted in a North Indian tertiary care medical college. A total of 106 patients with VAP, diagnosed based on the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) infection-related ventilator-associated complication (IVAC) criteria, were equally divided into two groups. Group A underwent both BFPP and culture testing; Group B was assessed using culture-based diagnostics alone. Demographic data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, ICU stay, ventilation duration, extubation timing, antibiotic usage, and 28-day mortality were recorded and analyzed.
resultsThe mean APACHE II score was higher in the culture group (30.7 ± 6.2) than in the BFPP group (29.5 ± 7.1; p = 0.20), but was not statistically significant. ICU stay was significantly shorter in BFPP-positive patients (median nine days) than in culture-positive patients (median 13 days; p = 0.021). Early extubation within seven days was more frequent in the BFPP group (73.7%) compared to the culture group (52.9%; p = 0.047). While overall 28-day mortality was lower in the BFPP group (55.8%) compared to the culture group (62.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). However, sex-stratified analysis showed significantly lower mortality among both males (p = 0.037) and females (p = 0.048) in the BFPP group. A concerning finding was the higher mortality rate in BFPP-negative patients (43.5%) compared to culture-negative cases (38.5%; p = 0.042).
conclusionThe integration of the BFPP into the diagnostic workflow for VAP demonstrated improved intermediate clinical outcomes, including reduced ICU stay, earlier extubation, and shortened ventilation duration. While overall mortality benefits were not statistically significant, subgroup analyses indicated a potential survival advantage with BFPP-guided management, particularly in pathogen-positive cases. However, caution is warranted in interpreting negative molecular results without clinical correlation, as these may lead to delayed or inappropriate therapy. This study supports the adoption of molecular diagnostics as a complementary tool to conventional cultures in managing VAP, especially when paired with robust clinical judgment and antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.