Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516462›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Precision Prescribing in the ICU: Evaluating BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel and Standard Culture-Guided Therapy for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

Ravindra S Bohra, Sushant Khanduri, Sonu Sama, Barnali Kakati, Rakhee Sodhi Khanduri, Varuna Jethani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravindra S BohraRespiratory Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, IND.
Sushant KhanduriRespiratory Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, IND.
Sonu SamaCritical Care Medicine, HImalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, IND.
Barnali KakatiMicrobiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Rakhee Sodhi KhanduriRespiratory Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, IND.
Varuna JethaniRespiratory Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in ICUs. Timely identification of pathogens is critical to initiating targeted antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluated the clinical and diagnostic impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (BFPP; BioFire Diagnostics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA), a rapid multiplex PCR-based test, compared to conventional culture and sensitivity testing in patients with VAP.

methodsA prospective observational longitudinal study was conducted in a North Indian tertiary care medical college. A total of 106 patients with VAP, diagnosed based on the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) infection-related ventilator-associated complication (IVAC) criteria, were equally divided into two groups. Group A underwent both BFPP and culture testing; Group B was assessed using culture-based diagnostics alone. Demographic data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, ICU stay, ventilation duration, extubation timing, antibiotic usage, and 28-day mortality were recorded and analyzed.

resultsThe mean APACHE II score was higher in the culture group (30.7 ± 6.2) than in the BFPP group (29.5 ± 7.1; p = 0.20), but was not statistically significant. ICU stay was significantly shorter in BFPP-positive patients (median nine days) than in culture-positive patients (median 13 days; p = 0.021). Early extubation within seven days was more frequent in the BFPP group (73.7%) compared to the culture group (52.9%; p = 0.047). While overall 28-day mortality was lower in the BFPP group (55.8%) compared to the culture group (62.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). However, sex-stratified analysis showed significantly lower mortality among both males (p = 0.037) and females (p = 0.048) in the BFPP group. A concerning finding was the higher mortality rate in BFPP-negative patients (43.5%) compared to culture-negative cases (38.5%; p = 0.042).

conclusionThe integration of the BFPP into the diagnostic workflow for VAP demonstrated improved intermediate clinical outcomes, including reduced ICU stay, earlier extubation, and shortened ventilation duration. While overall mortality benefits were not statistically significant, subgroup analyses indicated a potential survival advantage with BFPP-guided management, particularly in pathogen-positive cases. However, caution is warranted in interpreting negative molecular results without clinical correlation, as these may lead to delayed or inappropriate therapy. This study supports the adoption of molecular diagnostics as a complementary tool to conventional cultures in managing VAP, especially when paired with robust clinical judgment and antimicrobial stewardship.

Indexed as

biofirebiofire filmarray pneumonia panelculture sensitivityicu outcomesmultiplex pcrrapid diagnosticsventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID42516462
PMCPMC13404242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.