Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516443›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Bridging the Gap: The Transition Toward University-Level Midwifery Education and Autonomous Practice in Ukraine.

Igor Lakhno, Victoria Romaieva, Svitlana Pak, Iryna Sykal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Igor LakhnoObstetrics and Gynecology, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, UKR.
Victoria RomaievaObstetrics and Gynecology, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, UKR.
Svitlana PakObstetrics and Gynecology, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, UKR.
Iryna SykalObstetrics and Gynecology, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, UKR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midwifery in Ukraine is currently undergoing a transformative shift from deep-seated traditional roots toward professional autonomy and alignment with international standards. Historically, care transitioned from village midwives, known as babas or spovytukhas, to formalized training in the 18th century, and scientific professionalization led by figures such as Ivan Lazarevich, who championed a physiological approach to childbirth. However, the Soviet period introduced a physician-led, medicalized model that often integrated midwifery with nursing at a sub-degree level. Currently, the profession faces acute modern pressures caused by the 2022 full-scale invasion, which has disrupted services, forced births into shelters, and contributed to a rise in pregnancy complications. Systemic challenges include significant workforce shortages and curriculum gaps; a 2023-2024 United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) assessment found that Ukrainian curricula cover a good percentage of key sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) competencies, but not all. To address these issues, Ukraine is leveraging the Bologna Process and European Union (EU) accession aspirations to modernize education toward Bachelor of Science (BSc), Master of Science (MSc), and doctoral (PhD) levels. International collaborations, such as the 'Midwifery Bridges' project with Sweden, aim to adopt autonomous care models. Furthermore, simulation-based education has emerged as a critical technological tool for safely developing clinical dexterity and emergency preparedness amid wartime disruptions. Ultimately, these reforms seek to establish midwives as independent, responsible birth attendants providing woman-centered, evidence-based care.

Indexed as

bologna processeu directive 2005/36/ecivan lazarevichmaternal healthmidwiferyphysiological birthprofessional autonomysimulation-based education sbesrhr competenciesukraine

Identifiers

PMID42516443
PMCPMC13403754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.