ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Lessons learned from the frontline implementing person-centered practice: a practical pathway that addresses known challenges.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Person-centred care (PCC) is widely endorsed as essential to high-quality healthcare yet consistent frontline delivery remains elusive. Existing frameworks largely describe what person-centred cultures should look like but provide limited operational guidance on how to enact person-centredness within real interactions under real conditions. This practice-informed perspective paper argues that broader frameworks need to be supported by practical methodologies that directly impact provider behaviour. Drawing on two decades of experience developing and implementing HealthChange® Methodology (HCM) with over 15,000 healthcare providers across three continents, we describe how a micro-engagement skills course transformed into a service delivery methodology for PCC and behaviour change. We openly acknowledge a conflict of interest as the commercial developers of HCM. HCM provides plain-language behavioural definitions, a consultation decision framework and audit tools that make person-centredness visible, measurable and improvable. Unlike frameworks operating at the organisational level, HCM defines a set of Person-Centred Practice Principles within a behaviour change framework to operationalise person-centredness within interactions across all health service roles. To our knowledge no other methodology integrates behaviour change science, health literacy guidance and a consultation decision framework into a single accessible operational system. We describe HCM's relationship to existing PCC frameworks, its distinctive features and how they address barriers consistently identified in the implementation literature. The evidence base is predominantly observational and practice-based. Independent research is needed and actively invited. PCC will become more widespread when broader frameworks are supported by practical, scalable methodologies that translate values into consistent everyday practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.