ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Prognosis and recovery trajectories in prolonged disorders of consciousness: protocol for the PDOCC 5-year prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC), encompassing vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), represent a formidable clinical challenge characterized by substantial uncertainty in prognostic assessment. Although prior studies have yielded several short-term observational findings, large-scale, long-term longitudinal data delineating the 5-year natural history of pDoC remain scarce-particularly within the Chinese healthcare context. Moreover, existing studies have frequently lacked standardized multimodal assessment protocols and have failed to account for competing risks (e.g., mortality) in statistical models, thereby limiting the accuracy of currently available prognostic tools. The present study aims to address this critical evidence gap through the establishment of a high-quality prospective cohort. Methods: The PDOCC study is a single-center, prospective cohort investigating 5-year disease trajectories in 1,000 patients (aged 18-80) with prolonged disorders of consciousness (VS or MCS ≥ 28 days post-brain injury) (traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies) enrolled at Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital. Data collection includes standardized clinical assessments (CRS-R, GOS-E, DRS, EQ-5D, SF-36), neuroimaging (MRI/DTI/fMRI), and biomarkers (NfL, GFAP, S100B). Follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months combine in-person evaluations (all timepoints) with remote telephone interviews (3-month intervals after the 6-month visit). Neuroimaging and biomarkers are assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Primary outcomes are: (1) consciousness recovery, defined as emergence from MCS (eMCS) according to the CRS-R criteria (i.e., consistent functional communication and/or functional object use) sustained for ≥4 consecutive weeks; (2) all-cause mortality; and (3) major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, stroke). Secondary outcomes include: (1) functional status changes (GOS-E, DRS); (2) dynamic biomarker changes (NfL, S100B, GFAP); (3) health-related quality of life (EQ-5D); and (4) rehospitalization rate. Time-to-event analyses will use Fine-Gray competing-risk models to account for mortality as a competing event. Prognostic prediction modeling will be conducted in three sequential stages: a clinical model, a neuroimaging-augmented model (DTI/fMRI), and a fully integrated multimodal model additionally incorporating serum biomarkers (NfL, GFAP, S100B). Discussion: The PDOCC study will generate the first comprehensive longitudinal dataset characterizing long-term (5-year) outcomes of pDoC in a southern Chinese population. Through the incorporation of competing-risk analysis and a hybrid follow-up strategy, this protocol mitigates methodological biases that are prevalent in disorders of consciousness (DoC) research. The prognostic prediction models developed are anticipated to inform individualized rehabilitation decision-making, optimize the allocation of healthcare resources, and provide a methodological framework for future multicenter collaborative investigations. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=246240, Identifier ChiCTR2400091315.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.