ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2026
Effects of High-Intensity Resistance Training Volume on Muscle Performance and Blood-derived Markers in Recreationally Trained Subjects.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity resistance training (HIRT) with different training volumes on physical performance and blood-derived markers adaptations in recreationally trained subjects. Thirty subjects of both genders (21.7 ± 1.8 years old; body mass 62.4 ± 6.5 kg; height 1.7 ± 0.03 m) were randomly allocated to perform lower (G4; women = 7; men = 8) or higher (G6; women = 8; men = 7) training volume, which consisted of 4 and 6 weekly sets per muscle group, respectively. The HIRT method consisted of 2 sets of the following: 6 repetitions maximum (RM) at 85% of the 1RM followed by 20-seconds of rest, 3RM, another 20-seconds of rest, followed by 3RM, and finally, 2:30 minutes of rest. After 2:30 minutes of rest, the participants repeated the entire sequence a second time (i.e., the second series was performed). Muscle performance and blood-derived markers were assessed before and after 4 weeks of training. No significant differences in physical performance were observed between groups. However, there were significant changes in creatine kinase (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.