ArticleOman journal of ophthalmology
Clinical profile, optical coherence tomography, and outcomes of uveitic macular edema at a tertiary eye care center in India.
Article in Oman journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the prevalence, optical coherence tomography (OCT) features, and visual outcomes in patients with uveitic macular edema (UME).
methodsThis was a retrospective, observational study conducted by a single uvea specialist at a tertiary eye care center in South. We analyzed UME cases at a tertiary eye care center between 2019 and 2024. Demographic data, OCT patterns, and edema thickness and visual acuity were analyzed.
resultsWe analyzed UME cases at a tertiary eye care center between 2015 and 2019. The mean age was 42.20 ± 29.80 years. Females were more common than males (25:17). UME was found mostly in intermediate uveitis (33, 60%). Cystoid with neurosensory detachment (NSD) was the most common type (24, 42.9%), followed by the cystoid type (22, 39.3%). The mean follow-up duration was 3.75 months. UME thickness was 536.6 ± 375.8 μ before treatment, and posttreatment, it partially resolved to 372.9 ± 367 μ. After treatment, UME completely resolved in 22 (39.2%) cases, partially resolved in 24 (43.6%), remained unchanged in 6 (10.9%), and deteriorated in four (7.3%) eyes. The mean final best-corrected visual acuity was 0.41. A statistically significant difference was observed in the pre- and posttreatment visual acuity and macular edema thickness (
conclusionThis study showed that UME is more common in females, occurs in middle age, and is more common in intermediate uveitis. Cystoid with NSD was the most common. Visual acuity improved with treatment in the majority of the cases. Disease-specific outcomes, investigative modalities, and treatment used are the factors influencing assessment and final visual outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.