SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
A systematic review of delay discounting among workers: framing effects, resource availability, and health.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A higher rate of delay discounting has been linked to a range of health-risk behaviors and adverse health outcomes. Despite its relevance, delay discounting has limited application in organizational contexts. The aim of this systematic review was to identify empirical studies on the application of delay discounting in organizations or among workers. Sixteen studies were included. Overall, contextual factors (resource availability and negative income shock) and methodological factors (framework, reward magnitude, task type) influenced delay discounting. Consistent effects were observed, including preference reversals, magnitude and sign effects, and clear distinctions between delay and probability discounting. Limitations include insufficient characterization of organizational variables, insufficient information on data systematicity and fit level of the mathematical discounting functions. Despite these limitations, delay discounting proved to be a sensitive and applicable behavioral indicator of increased self-control, capable of predicting adherence to a physical activity intervention in sedentary workers. The review also identifies opportunities for future research, including multidimensional delay discounting analysis, inter-outcome tasks, and the integration of comparison groups in health-related studies. Overall, delay discounting provides a practical framework for studying decision-making in organizational contexts and for guiding interventions to improve workers' self-regulation and long-term goal achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.