ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The effect of attention on wellbeing in combat sport athletes: the mediating role of competitive anxiety.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to examine whether the effect of attentional processes on psychological well-being in combat sport athletes operates directly or indirectly through competitive anxiety within an integrated model. Methods: A total of 418 actively competing athletes participated in the study, and the relationships among athlete attention, competitive anxiety, and psychological well-being were analyzed using a regression-based mediation model. Results: The findings revealed that athlete attention had a strong and positive effect on psychological well-being (β = 0.718), while also showing a significant negative effect on competitive anxiety (β = 0.574). In turn, competitive anxiety was found to negatively predict psychological well-being (β = -0.242). When competitive anxiety was included in the model, the direct effect of attention on psychological well-being decreased (β = 0.579), indicating the presence of a mediation structure. Bootstrap analysis further confirmed that the indirect effect was statistically significant (β = 0.139, 95% CI [0.091, 0.202]), demonstrating that competitive anxiety plays a partial mediating role in this relationship. Discussion: These results suggest that attentional processes are associated with psychological well-being both directly and indirectly through their statistical association with competitive anxiety. From a theoretical perspective, the findings support the assumptions of Attentional Control Theory within a sport context and highlight the role of attention as a multidimensional regulatory mechanism. Practically, the findings suggest that interventions targeting both attentional control and anxiety regulation may be associated with more favorable psychological well-being outcomes than approaches focusing solely on performance-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.