Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42516181›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Relational and contextual dynamics in online teaching Turkish as a foreign language: toward a relationally mediated learning system.

Bilge Nur Dogan Guldenoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bilge Nur Dogan GuldenogluPolice Academy, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study offers a reconceptualization of online second and heritage language learning as a relationally mediated and context-dependent process, thereby addressing a key limitation in existing individualistic and technologically oriented models, which tend to treat relational dynamics as secondary rather than constitutive elements of learning. Drawing on a multi-stakeholder qualitative design, it examines how students, parents, and teachers conceptualize and experience learning Turkish in transnational online contexts, where Turkish functions as both a second/foreign language and a heritage language depending on learners' linguistic and family backgrounds. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 27 participants and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that language learning is primarily grounded in relational and identity-based meanings, with family interaction and cultural continuity serving as central drivers of engagement. Beyond meaning construction, learning emerges as a dynamic system shaped by the interaction of learner characteristics, instructional mediation, and contextual conditions, with relational dynamics regulating how these elements are experienced. Online instruction is not perceived as a neutral technological medium, but as an interactionally constructed environment in which engagement and relational connection shape participation. Building on these findings, the study advances a relationally mediated learning system that integrates meaning, learning processes, and engagement within a unified framework. By foregrounding relational mechanisms as constitutive elements of learning, it offers a theoretically robust and context-sensitive account of language learning in complex, transnational, and digitally mediated environments.

Indexed as

heritage languageonline language teachingrelationally mediated learningsecond language learning (L2)transnational contexts

Identifiers

PMID42516181
PMCPMC13403245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.