ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2026
Emergency anticancer therapy in intensive care medicine: A mainland China survey.
Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify intensivists' attitudes toward emergency anticancer therapy (EAT) in patients with cancer in intensive care units (ICUs). Material and methods: A 11-question survey was performed among intensivists in the Cancer Critical Care Medicine Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association and Critical Care Medicine Committee of Beijing Association of Oncology between November 11 and December 11, 2024. Response were compared between mixed and oncologic ICU physicians. Results: In total, 120 intensivists completed the survey. For 9 of 11 questions, the agreement rate exceeded 85%. There were 61.5% mixed ICU physicican and 35.5% oncologic ICU physicians in favor of compostion of the composition of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) composing of an intensivist, an oncologis and a pharmacist, respectively. However this difference was not significant (P=0.281). Conclusions: Intensivists in China generally hold positive attitudes toward emergency anticancer therapy in ICUs for critically ill patients with cancer-related organ dysfunction. However, opinions differ regarding the MDT composition between mixed and oncologic ICU physicicans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.