ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Development of a Consensus-Based Checklist for Physician-Performed Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation in Japan: A Two-Round Delphi Study.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a high-risk, multicomponent procedure that requires standardized preparation, team coordination, and rescue planning. In Japan, however, no national protocol exists for physician-performed ETI, and practice remains inconsistent despite recognition of appropriate care. Within the development phase of complex intervention research, this study aimed to develop a consensus-based checklist for physician-performed prehospital ETI in Japan using a Delphi process. Methods: A two-round Delphi survey was conducted among experienced physicians involved in physician-staffed prehospital care in Japan. Candidate items were developed from the literature and organized according to the workflow of prehospital ETI. Participants rated each item using a 4-point Likert scale, and consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Consensus items were subsequently summarized into a practical checklist. Results: Forty experts participated in Round 1 (response rate, 69%). All completed Round 2. Consensus increased from 72 of 90 items (80%) in Round 1 to 76 of 80 items (95%) in Round 2 after item refinement. Agreement was high for preparation, monitoring, and confirmation. In contrast, context-dependent items, such as patient relocation and medication choices, showed lower agreement. The final items were integrated into an eight-domain checklist. Conclusions: This Delphi study developed a proposed consensus-based checklist for physician-performed prehospital ETI in Japan. As a consensus-building step within the development phase of a complex intervention, the checklist identifies core procedural elements while allowing for local operational variation. Future studies should assess feasibility, adherence, and clinical impact in real-world prehospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.