ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2026
Bayesian nonparametric mixtures of categorical directed graphs for personalized causal inference.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying the causal effect of a treatment on a disease is a crucial task in medical science for the administration of effective therapies. Typically, such causal effects are inferred from multivariate data that are collected on patients and recorded in the form of categorical variables, including risk factors involved in disease progression, treatment assignments, and disease status. This feature motivates an approach to causal inference based on categorical Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), which provide an effective framework for causal reasoning in complex multivariate settings. In this context, traditional DAG-based methods assume population homogeneity and accordingly attribute a unique causal effect to all subjects. However, this assumption is often unrealistic in clinical contexts, since patients may exhibit heterogeneous characteristics, possibly linked to unmeasured features. To address this issue, we propose a Bayesian nonparametric methodology based on a Dirichlet Process mixture of categorical DAGs, which allows treatment effects to vary across individuals because of underlying clustering structures in the data. We develop a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for Bayesian posterior inference and evaluate our methodology through simulation studies. We then analyze patients affected by HER2+ breast cancer undergoing therapies that may cause cardiotoxic side effects. Importantly, our findings show that approaches neglecting population heterogeneity may produce biased results, since they can over- or under-estimate the risk of cardiotoxicity across patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.