ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
In Silico Selection of GAT-1 Inhibitors.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary control mechanism for synaptic uptake of GABA is through γ-aminobutyric acid transporter 1 (GAT-1, SLC6A1), a known target for anti-epileptic drugs. Although there is a clinically used GAT-1 inhibitor, tiagabine, the development of a new ligand with an advanced pharmacological profile is desirable. For this purpose, a multi-tiered virtual approach to screening has been created, involving pharmacophore-based search; application of the Informational Spectrum Method for Small Molecules, followed by EIIP/AQVN filtering (ISM-SM); molecular docking using an ensemble of several experimentally obtained structures of GAT-1; and ADMET predictions. Pharmacophore-based screening of the ZINC database of natural products, combined with ISM-SM/EIIP filtering, yielded 237 candidate compounds. Structural separation analysis discriminated between the positives and negatives, enabling enrichment-based prioritization. The use of a composite normalized rank score based on docking affinity and structural similarity allowed for the identification of the top candidates: ZINC03643214 and ZINC67840571. Collectively, these refinements establish a more sophisticated computational model for identifying novel GAT-1 inhibitors and highlight promising candidates for future experimental evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.