Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515628›Full record

ReviewViruses2026

Regulatory Implications and Control Measures for Lumpy Skin Disease, Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza, and Foot-and-Mouth Disease in European Livestock.

Carolina Baptista, Bart de Leeuw, Valentina Busin, Jobke Van Hout-van Dijk, Max Bastian, Rachael Tarlinton, Nancy De Briyne, Wiebke Jansen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolina BaptistaCIBIO (Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos), InBIO (Rede de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva), Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Bart de LeeuwEVERI (European Veterinarians in Education, Research and Industry), 1030 Brussels, Belgium.
Valentina BusinAnimal Husbandry and Production, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Jobke Van Hout-van DijkPig Health Department, Royal GD, 7418 EZ Deventer, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3514-7358
Max BastianFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, German Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-8568
Rachael TarlintonSchool of Veterinary, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-2311
Nancy De BriyneFederation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), 1030 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-930X
Wiebke JansenFederation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), 1030 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-6705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Transboundary notifiable infectious viral diseases, such as lumpy skin disease (LSD), highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), and foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), continue to severely disrupt Europe's animal health and welfare, food security, and the multi-burdened livestock sector. (2) Methods: Through an extensive literature search, with data collected from the scientific literature, outbreak notifications, and European Union (EU) policy reports, this study synthesises evidence on the economic and societal impacts of preventive mass vaccination compared with stamping out for listed viral animal diseases in Europe. (3) Results: Evidence from LSD, HPAI, and FMD indicates that preventive vaccination reduces outbreak size, duration, and associated economic losses, particularly in high-risk and endemic settings. For LSD, vaccination is essential in eradication, as culling alone fails. For HPAI, evolving epidemiology supports vaccination-to-live strategies. In contrast, for FMD, despite epidemiological benefits of vaccination, the maintenance of FMD-free status without vaccination remains the dominant policy objective, constraining adoption of vaccination-to-live due to trade implications. (4) Conclusions: Overall, findings support the following recommendations: shifting toward preventive vaccination tailored by country and disease, prioritising vaccine-to-live strategies within a harmonised regulatory framework, and strengthening differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA)-based surveillance and trade-compatible frameworks, all sensible approaches to protect animal welfare and economic stability in Europe's livestock sector.

Indexed as

Foot-and-Mouth DiseaseInfluenza in BirdsLivestockLumpy Skin DiseaseAnimalsDisease OutbreaksEuropeEuropean UnionVaccinationViral VaccinesViral Vaccinescullingeconomic costsimmunisationlivestockstamping outvaccinationviral diseases

Identifiers

PMID42515628
PMCPMC13431630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.