Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515611›Full record

ArticleViruses2026

Environmental Sampling Using Shoe Booties for the Detection of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in Animal Pens.

Judy Hodge, Sean Yeo, Kate Hole, Hanh H T Nguyen, Wei Shern Lee, Jack S Richards, Sonja Laurendeau, Charles Nfon, Shawn Babiuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Judy HodgeNational Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1015 Arlington Street, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.
Sean YeoNational Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1015 Arlington Street, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.
Kate HoleNational Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1015 Arlington Street, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.
Hanh H T NguyenZiP Diagnostics Pty Ltd., Collingwood, VIC 3066, Australia.
Wei Shern LeeZiP Diagnostics Pty Ltd., Collingwood, VIC 3066, Australia.
Jack S RichardsZiP Diagnostics Pty Ltd., Collingwood, VIC 3066, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-6989
Sonja LaurendeauRuminant and Swine Programs, Animal Health Directorate, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1081 Main Street, Moncton, NB E1C 8R2, Canada.
Charles NfonNational Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1015 Arlington Street, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.
Shawn BabiukNational Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1015 Arlington Street, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1265-7264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consequences of foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks in non-endemic countries are devastating. Early detection and confirmation of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) are critical for controlling outbreaks. Diagnostic sampling currently uses direct sampling of suspected animals, including swabs and/or vesicular fluid. In the event of an FMD outbreak, there is limited veterinary capacity to sample all animals in the control zones. Thus, environmental sampling methods (shoe booties, ropes, and environmental swabs) were assessed and compared to direct animal sampling for experimentally infected cattle and swine. Environmental sampling methods such as shoe booties were sufficient to identify FMDV by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and nanopore sequencing, similarly to oral swabs collected from animals. Furthermore, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based point-of-care test produced by ZiP Diagnostics was able to rapidly detect FMDV from clinical and environmental samples with Cq values of 30 or less. This study demonstrates a proof of concept that shoe booties can be used to detect FMDV in animal pens prior to the onset of clinical signs in animals. The use of shoe booties for surveillance sampling of non-clinical animals on multiple premises in a given zone would increase operational capacity and enable earlier detection for a faster response to FMD outbreaks.

Indexed as

Foot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusSpecimen HandlingAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRapid Diagnostic TestsShoesSwineSwine Diseasesearly detectionenvironmental samplingFMDVfoot and mouth diseaseoral fluidsoutbreak responseshoe bootie

Identifiers

PMID42515611
PMCPMC13431528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.