ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Toward Robust EEG Classification Using Adaptive CNN-Transformer and Inception Architectures and Signal Level Augmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG) enables practical brain-state monitoring for applications such as emotion recognition and event-related potential (ERP)-based deception detection. However, robust EEG classification remains challenging because of noise, non-stationarity, limited labeled data, and substantial inter-subject variability. In this work, we present a sensor-density-aware framework that applies different deep architectures to low- and high-channel EEG acquisition settings and augments the training data using a physiologically constrained signal-level procedure. For the 5-channel LieWaves dataset, the CNN-Transformer achieved 97.14±1.36% subject-dependent accuracy with augmentation, compared with 92.91±4.34% without augmentation. For the 62-channel SEED dataset, the Inception CNN achieved 98.52±0.79% with augmentation and 98.44±0.83% without augmentation. The improvement on LieWaves was statistically significant, whereas the small improvement on SEED was not statistically significant. Under subject-independent evaluation, performance was 57.83±8.96% on LieWaves with augmentation and 57.95±8.38% on SEED. These results demonstrate strong subject-dependent performance while confirming that cross-subject generalization remains challenging. Overall, the proposed framework combines sensor-density-aware architecture selection with signal-level augmentation and provides a systematic comparison of subject-dependent and subject-independent EEG classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.