ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optical Coastal GNSS-Denied Navigation for Reduction in AUV Underwater Navigation Error.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The paper addresses the problem of maritime navigation in coastal areas without access to satellite positioning data. The proposed approach relies on visual information from a monocular camera supported by map-derived coastal information. Although the operational concept assumes the use of publicly available cartographic data, the method's preparation and evaluation require additional processing steps, including high-resolution aerial imagery, GIS-based extraction of coastal features, semantic segmentation, and trained convolutional neural network models. The problem discussed in the paper concerns, for example, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles that seek to reduce underwater dead-reckoning navigation error by surfacing and using information about what is visible around them, in a way similar to how a human would. To solve the above problem, a system was proposed that compares the camera's representation of the observed coastline with the map representation of the area where the vehicle is most likely located. The system was validated using real-world data. The tests revealed that the information contained in a flat map is insufficient for accurate position estimation. Accuracy is also significantly affected by errors in the semantic segmentation used to extract land features from camera images, as well as by potential errors in the camera viewing angle. The achieved accuracies are sufficient for navigation away from land, but when operating close to land, the proposed system appears significantly insufficient. The paper specifies the system and reports the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.