ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Impact of Structured High-Frequency Disturbances on Linear Identification of Lateral Vehicle Dynamics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper investigates the influence of weak but structured high-frequency disturbances on the linear system identification of lateral vehicle dynamics using experimental measurement data. The analyzed dataset originates from previously conducted driver-in-the-loop experiments involving free-driving and slalom maneuvers. Frequency-domain analysis confirms that the dominant vehicle dynamics are concentrated below approximately 2-3 Hz, while a weak but persistent narrow-band disturbance around 10 Hz is consistently present in the steering signal. To investigate the influence of this disturbance on identification, different disturbance-handling strategies are compared, including notch filtering, low-pass filtering, ARX, IV-ARX, and ARMAX model structures. The comparison considers prediction performance, model complexity, identified dynamics, and robustness under different measurement conditions. The results show that increasing the deterministic model order is generally less effective than either targeted preprocessing or explicit noise modeling. When the disturbance is spectrally well separated from the relevant vehicle dynamics, notch filtering combined with a low-order ARX model provides the most effective solution. If preprocessing is not possible, ARMAX models achieve comparable performance by representing part of the disturbance through the noise model. IV-ARX models are used as a benchmark to verify that the main conclusions remain valid under possible closed-loop bias. Based on these findings, a practical engineering workflow is proposed for selecting appropriate disturbance-handling strategies according to the spectral characteristics of the measured signals. The proposed methodology provides guidance for robust control-oriented identification of lateral vehicle dynamics using realistic measurement data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.