ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physics-Guided CNN Detection of Crack-Associated Events from Embedded Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crack detection in composite structures remains a central challenge in structural health monitoring, particularly when sensing must rely on a small number of embedded multiplexed fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs). Here, we present a physics-guided convolutional neural network (CNN) framework for crack-associated event detection from multiplexed FBG interrogator signals acquired during the three-point bending of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) beams. The dataset was constructed from raw interrogator recordings and synchronized force-displacement metadata while preserving the cracked and non-cracked loading stages present in the experiments. Each candidate response was encoded by 13 synchronized optical, loading, and mechanics-guided descriptors, including Euler-Bernoulli expected strain and residual terms, where the residual denotes the difference between the measured response and the elastic response predicted by beam theory. A compact one-dimensional CNN operating on 30-response sequences was evaluated on 64 experimental runs under strict leave-one-run-out validation. At the selected operating point, the model reached window-level precision of 0.900, recall of 0.910, F1 score of 0.905, and balanced accuracy of 0.942, while the corresponding run-level decision reached a precision of 0.833, a recall of 1.000, an F1 score of 0.909, and a balanced accuracy of 0.969. Bootstrap resampling over runs yielded 95% confidence intervals of 0.787-0.978 for window-level F1 and 0.769-1.000 for run-level F1. To probe generalization beyond the initial fabrication batch, the final frozen pipeline was also tested once on seven later-batch runs from two newly manufactured specimens, where it reached a window-level precision of 0.908, a recall of 1.000, an F1 score of 0.952, a balanced accuracy of 0.969, an ROC-AUC of 0.979, a PR-AUC of 0.955, and perfect run-level classification. These results show that a compact sequence CNN, enriched with mechanics-guided strain interpretation, can extract robust crack-event signatures from multiplexed FBG measurements while preserving a simple and reproducible modeling pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.