ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Raman Peaks Feature-Based Machine Learning for Raman Spectroscopy Quantification of Inorganic Pollutants.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates how Raman peak features influence the accuracy of pollutant concentration quantification in Raman spectroscopy using feature-based machine learning. A Raman peak feature-based approach is applied to data acquired from laboratory Raman equipment for inorganic anion mixtures, with the objective of identifying processing strategies suitable for low-resolution Raman instruments. A dataset comprising nitrate, nitrite, and sulphate dissolved in water at varying concentrations was used to develop a pre-processing pipeline, train and validate models, and perform linear regression using peak- and area-based features extracted from analyte-specific spectral fingerprint regions. Signal downsampling was employed to simulate reduced spectral resolution and evaluate feature robustness under peak broadening conditions. Results indicate that peak-based regression is more sensitive to reduced peak resolution for nitrate and sulphate, whereas area-based regression produces more stable prediction errors across downsampling factors. Conversely, for nitrite, peak-based regression is less affected by downsampling, while area-based regression exhibits degraded performance. Area-based regression achieved mean absolute percentage errors below 7% and 16% for nitrate concentrations above 3833 mg/L and 1916 mg/L, respectively, and generally below 16% for sulphate concentrations above 1916 mg/L. For nitrite, peak-based regression yielded errors within 4%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.