ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multisource Urban Sensing Data Fusion and Dynamic Causal Graph Modeling for Explainable Traffic State Prediction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban traffic congestion prediction is an important problem in smart city sensing and intelligent traffic governance. Existing methods mostly rely on single-source traffic flow sensing data or static road topology, making it difficult to sufficiently characterize the dynamic congestion propagation process driven by multisource sensing information, such as traffic flow, vehicle trajectories, road images, public transportation, meteorological conditions, and sudden events. To address this issue, a spatiotemporal causal graph learning framework based on multisource urban sensing data is proposed for urban traffic state prediction, congestion identification, and explainable early warning. In this framework, traffic flow detector data, GPS trajectories, roadside camera data, public transportation data, weather data, and event records are first fused through a multisource urban sensing data collaborative encoding module, and the influence of low-quality or missing sensing modalities is suppressed using a reliability-aware attention mechanism. Subsequently, time-varying causal propagation relationships among road segments are adaptively learned from historical traffic states, road topology, and external disturbances through a dynamic spatiotemporal causal graph learning module. Finally, spatial diffusion and temporal evolution are jointly modeled by a causality-explanation-driven congestion prediction module, and key congestion sources, propagation paths, and inducing factors are outputs. Experimental results based on multisource traffic sensing data from the main urban area of Hangzhou show that the proposed method achieves MAE values of 3.21, 3.79, and 4.48 in 15-min, 30-min, and 60-min traffic state prediction tasks, respectively, outperforming ARIMA, XGBoost, LSTM, Transformer, STGCN, Graph WaveNet, GMAN, Multimodal Transformer, and the Causal Temporal Graph Network. In the ablation study, the complete model achieves an Accuracy of 0.914, a Precision of 0.902, a Recall of 0.889, an F1 of 0.895, and an AUC of 0.956. For congestion identification and early warning under complex scenarios, F1 values of 0.927, 0.904, and 0.893 are achieved under peak-hour, rainy-weather, and traffic-event scenarios, respectively; the corresponding AUC values reach 0.966, 0.957, and 0.948; and the false alarm rate (FAR) values are reduced to 0.061, 0.072, and 0.081. The results indicate that the proposed method can effectively improve traffic state prediction accuracy, congestion early warning reliability, and model interpretability under multisource urban sensing conditions, thereby providing an effective technical pathway for AI-driven intelligent traffic sensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.