ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quality Cost A* Path Planning for Multi-Sensor Fusion in Corridor Smoke Scenarios.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indoor fire smoke degrades visible-light cameras and near-infrared Lidar through wavelength-dependent absorption and scattering, threatening robotic navigation safety. Existing path planners either ignore sensor degradation or rely on empirical penalties lacking a physical basis. To address these issues, this paper proposes Quality Cost A* (QC-A*), which maps Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) visibility fields to sensor perception quality via the Koschmieder and Beer-Lambert physical laws, embedding a cost function that drives paths away from high-attenuation regions. A multi-sensor fusion layer provides fault tolerance under sensor-specific failure conditions. The method is validated through FDS-based simulations across four smoke scenarios in a 20 m × 6 m corridor with 21 obstacles, using 50 start-goal pairs per scenario. Perception quality derives from Beer-Lambert optical transmittance, while the hazard-zone proportion quantifies path segments with visibility below 5 m. Across the Symmetric and Asymmetric scenarios, QC-A* reduces the low-visibility hazard-zone proportion from 40.7% to 19.6% and improves worst-case perception quality from 0.067 to 0.177, with a 15.3% path length increase, while remaining close to traditional A* in light-smoke conditions. Under constructed sensor failure tests, QC-A* maintains a 96-100% planning success rate versus 48% for Camera-Only and 70% for Lidar-Only. QC-A* shifts sensor degradation modeling from empirical penalty to physical mechanism, achieving a favorable safety-efficiency balance prioritizing perceptual safety, and provides an interpretable, generalizable framework for robotic fire-environment path planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.