Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515415›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Quality Cost A* Path Planning for Multi-Sensor Fusion in Corridor Smoke Scenarios.

Yang Feng, Shuai Zhu, Letian Liu, Xin Liu, Hua Xia, Bingkun Zhang, Hao Chen, Ben Wang, Yan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yang FengSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9917-2878
Shuai ZhuSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Letian LiuSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Xin LiuHangzhou Juqi Information Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311121, China.
Hua XiaSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0009-0002-6801-0996
Bingkun ZhangSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Hao ChenSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Ben WangSchool of Information Science and Engineering (SISE), Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5341-1642
Yan SunZhejiang Evaluation Center for Medical Service and Administration, Hangzhou 311121, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor fire smoke degrades visible-light cameras and near-infrared Lidar through wavelength-dependent absorption and scattering, threatening robotic navigation safety. Existing path planners either ignore sensor degradation or rely on empirical penalties lacking a physical basis. To address these issues, this paper proposes Quality Cost A* (QC-A*), which maps Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) visibility fields to sensor perception quality via the Koschmieder and Beer-Lambert physical laws, embedding a cost function that drives paths away from high-attenuation regions. A multi-sensor fusion layer provides fault tolerance under sensor-specific failure conditions. The method is validated through FDS-based simulations across four smoke scenarios in a 20 m × 6 m corridor with 21 obstacles, using 50 start-goal pairs per scenario. Perception quality derives from Beer-Lambert optical transmittance, while the hazard-zone proportion quantifies path segments with visibility below 5 m. Across the Symmetric and Asymmetric scenarios, QC-A* reduces the low-visibility hazard-zone proportion from 40.7% to 19.6% and improves worst-case perception quality from 0.067 to 0.177, with a 15.3% path length increase, while remaining close to traditional A* in light-smoke conditions. Under constructed sensor failure tests, QC-A* maintains a 96-100% planning success rate versus 48% for Camera-Only and 70% for Lidar-Only. QC-A* shifts sensor degradation modeling from empirical penalty to physical mechanism, achieving a favorable safety-efficiency balance prioritizing perceptual safety, and provides an interpretable, generalizable framework for robotic fire-environment path planning.

Indexed as

Beer-Lambert lawFDSimproved A* algorithmmulti-sensor fusionsmoke scenarios

Identifiers

PMID42515415
PMCPMC13417905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.