ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Secure Multi-Layer Edge-Based Sensor Architecture for Building-Level Disaster Monitoring and Decision Support.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural and human-induced disasters can cause significant loss of life and property, particularly at the building level, highlighting the need for effective early detection, real-time monitoring, and rapid post-disaster response. Current disaster management approaches largely rely on citizen reports and manual observations, which may lead to delays and inefficient resource allocation, especially in large-scale events. This study proposes a secure, modular, multi-layer disaster monitoring and decision-support architecture that integrates sensor-based building-edge monitoring units deployed at both the building and apartment levels with a central emergency monitoring system. The architecture comprises three main layers: edge sensing, secure cellular communication, and central decision-making. Building-edge monitoring units collect data related to structural motion and inclination indicators, fire, flooding, and gas leaks, perform preliminary processing, and transmit aggregated data securely to the central system. Communication security is ensured through a certificate-based authentication mechanism supported by a dedicated certificate authority, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent data injection. The central system performs automated event detection and separately evaluates physical building condition and communication status, enabling prioritized response planning. To evaluate feasibility, a two-building prototype was implemented and tested through scenario-based experiments involving two independently operating building-edge monitoring units connected to the same central monitoring system. The prototype demonstrated concurrent secure data acquisition and central aggregation from two buildings; however, district- and regional-scale performance requires further validation through larger-scale controlled load tests and field deployments. Under laboratory conditions, the prototype demonstrated sensor-data acquisition, authenticated transmission, and centralized event classification. End-to-end latency and building-edge monitoring unit power consumption were also measured; however, the prototype was not validated under environmental conditions representative of real disasters. Overall, the findings suggest that sensor-based, secure, and centralized monitoring systems may complement traditional disaster management approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.