Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515398›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Lightweight Keyword Spotting Method Using a Convolutional Spiking Neural Network with Learnable Synaptic Delays.

Xiaohuan Li, Yi Liu, Libo Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaohuan LiCollege of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunication, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5623-7670
Yi LiuCollege of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunication, Nanjing 210023, China.
Libo ZhengCollege of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunication, Nanjing 210023, China.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Team of Innovation and Entrepreneurship CZ118SC23058Scientific Research Startup Fund for High-Level Introduced Talents NY219143, XK1060919143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keyword spotting (KWS) systems based on Spike Neural Networks (SNNs) offer a promising solution for always-on voice interfaces. However, achieving a favorable trade-off between computational footprint and recognition accuracy remains challenging for resource-constrained edge devices. This paper proposes a lightweight convolutional spiking neural network (CSNN) for KWS that combines a streamable Mel-to-Spike encoder, a convolutional spiking feature extractor, and a delay-aware classification module that uses learnable synaptic delays. The proposed encoder adopts streaming frame-by-frame encoding to convert speech features into sparse spike trains, while the delay-aware classifier jointly optimizes synaptic weights and temporal delays for enhanced spatiotemporal evidence aggregation. Experiments on the Google Speech Commands V1 and V2 (GSC-V1 and GSC-V2), Heidelberg Digits (HD), and Chinese Mandarin Keyword (CMK) datasets show mean test accuracies of 94.37%, 92.87%, 99.10%, and 95.60%, respectively. The proposed method uses only 64.05 K and 68.14 K learnable parameters for the 12-class and 20-class classification, while maintaining strong robustness to additive noise. These results indicate that the proposed CSNN achieves a favorable algorithm-level balance among accuracy, compactness, and noise robustness for KWS.

Indexed as

CSNNkeyword spottinglightweight methodstreamable convolutional encodingsynaptic delays

Identifiers

PMID42515398
PMCPMC13417342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.