ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensor Inputs and Closed-Loop Neuromodulation in Spinal Cord Injury: From Animal Models to Clinical Translation.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Closed-loop neuromodulation systems for spinal cord injury (SCI) comprise a sensor layer that detects motor state or intent, a controller that converts this information into stimulation commands, and a stimulation interface that modulates spinal, peripheral, or supraspinal circuits. Although neuromodulation has shown potential for improving stepping, standing, trunk control, and upper-limb function after SCI, the performance of closed-loop systems depends critically on their reliability, latency, and practicality. This structured narrative review focuses on the sensor inputs used in closed-loop neuromodulation for SCI, including kinematic sensors, electromyography, force and pressure sensors, vision-based sensing, and emerging neural interfaces. We summarize how these signals have been used to estimate gait phase, posture, motor intent, and task state, and how sensor-driven strategies have progressed from animal models to early clinical applications. Preclinical studies provide mechanistic insights into activity-dependent, phase-specific, and proprioceptive feedback-mediated control, whereas human studies suggest that sensor-guided stimulation may improve functional specificity; however, comparative evidence remains limited. Future translation will require robust multimodal sensing, standardized reporting of latency and calibration burden, and practical designs suitable for supervised clinical and, ultimately, home use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.