ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning-Based Near-Infrared Laser Leakage Detection System for Wine Bottles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional methods for wine bottle packaging leakage detection often suffer from low efficiency, high false-positive rates, or an inability to detect micro-leakages. This paper proposes a near-infrared laser leakage detection system based on tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy at 1392 nm, combined with a LightGBM machine learning model. The system detects gaseous ethanol vapor escaping from leaking bottles, addressing the spectral interference caused by ambient water vapor. A total of 1410 samples were collected, and each raw 2000-point spectral contour was compressed into a 200-dimensional feature vector through baseline correction, Z-score normalization, and uniform down-sampling. A two-stage hyperparameter optimization strategy yielded the optimal LightGBM configuration with a 5-fold cross-validation. For the binary classification task, the model achieved an AUC of 0.9949 and an inference speed of 0.0058 ms per sample on a CPU, outperforming Random Forest, PLS, and four deep learning models. For the regression task, the model achieved an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.