ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Image Dataset Quality Evaluation System for Industrial Object Detection Tasks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The performance of visual detection models in industrial applications is strongly influenced by training dataset quality. Although imaging scheme design and algorithm optimization are often emphasized, systematic dataset quality evaluation remains insufficient. To address this gap, this study proposes a dataset quality evaluation framework for industrial object detection. It includes four dimensions and thirteen quantifiable indices: three for acquisition environment, two for image quality, three for dataset scale, and five for annotation quality. Normalization based on theoretical maximum scores is used to reduce biases caused by different score ranges, and dimension weights are assigned using Taguchi orthogonal experiments. Validation is performed on five public and three self-constructed datasets using YOLOv12n and RT-DETR-R18. A positive correlation trend is observed between the proposed scores and detection accuracy, with PLCC/SRCC/Kendall's tau values of 0.685/0.850/0.764 and 0.656/0.826/0.691, respectively. After second-level weight optimization, the correlations increase to 0.775/0.922/0.837 and 0.748/0.898/0.764. Corresponding
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.