ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Routine-Deviation Detection in Smart-Home Sensor Networks Using GRU Prediction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smart-home sensor networks enable unobtrusive monitoring of daily activity and are increasingly used to support independent living among older adults. However, many anomaly detection methods produce scalar anomaly scores or binary alerts without explaining how the detected behavior differs from a resident's normal routine. This paper proposes a two-stage framework for interpretable routine-deviation assessment using smart-home motion and door-contact sensors. In Stage 1, raw sensor streams are aligned on a two-second master calendar, aggregated into hourly event counts, mapped into functional household activity zones, and converted into daily routine profiles. A Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) routine prediction model is trained using a three-day lookback window to predict expected daily zone-level activity. Candidate routine-deviation days are automatically identified from daily prediction errors. In Stage 2, the recent monitoring period is plotted as 24-h radar profiles against the learned routine model, allowing a human expert to visually assess deviations in timing, location, and severity. The workflow was evaluated using 28 days of smart-home data collected from multiple independent residents. The proposed GRU framework achieved RMSE values ranging from 0.136 to 0.180 and MAE values ranging from 0.126 to 0.138 across the four participants, consistently outperforming the Previous-Day Baseline and generally providing lower prediction errors than the Seasonal Naïve Baseline. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of participant-specific routine modeling for personalized routine-deviation detection in smart-home environments. The results indicate that deviation-sensitive target zones differed across the four participants, suggesting the importance of participant-specific routine modeling. The proposed approach successfully links automated candidate routine-deviation identification with radar-based visual analytics, providing a proof-of-concept, personalized, and interpretable decision support workflow for ambient assisted living research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.