ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensor-Based Classification of Post-Stroke Motor Impairment Using Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Scores.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate multiple feature sets composed of sensor-based biomarkers acquired during walking for the automated estimation of post-stroke motor impairment levels using Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment (FMA-LE)-derived classes. Sensor-based walking data from the open-source ARRA dataset were combined with data collected at the Hospital of Braga. Data from 32 post-stroke individuals (FMA-LE motor score: 24 ± 3) were included. A decision tree classifier was evaluated using stratified six-fold cross-validation across different feature sets, including: correlated with motor impairment levels versus full feature sets; spatiotemporal versus surface electromyographic (sEMG) features; inclusion of demographic variables; and the use of data augmentation. The best performance was achieved using correlated sEMG features combined with age, paretic side, and body mass, along with noise-based data augmentation, yielding a validation Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.85 ± 0.16 and a test MCC of 0.70. sEMG features provided improved classification performance compared to spatiotemporal features, and comparable results were obtained using a reduced subset of muscles. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using sEMG-based features acquired during walking to classify post-stroke motor impairment levels. Feature reduction and inclusion of demographic variables may support efficient model design, while data augmentation may enhance generalization. Further validation in larger and more diverse datasets is required to assess robustness and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.