ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Smart Shoe System for Gait Analysis and Remote Monitoring in Parkinson's Disease-A Validation Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous gait monitoring is important in Parkinson's Disease (PD) as gait deteriorates with disease progression and responses to treatment vary over time. Wearable sensor systems offer a practical alternative to laboratory-based gait assessment for real-world monitoring. This study aimed to (1) validate spatiotemporal gait parameters derived from the NUSHU smart shoe system against the Vicon motion capture system in healthy older adults and individuals with PD, and (2) assess whether measurement agreement was maintained during active vibrotactile feedback delivery. Thirty-two participants (17 with mild to moderate PD and 15 age- and gender-matched healthy older adults; mean age 67 ± 7.4 years) completed overground walking trials under no vibration, stance phase vibration, and swing phase vibration conditions. A total of 4790 strides were analysed using linear mixed effects models. Overall agreement was good for stride length (ICC = 0.894, CCC = 0.926), stride time (ICC = 0.853, CCC = 0.954), and velocity (ICC = 0.885, CCC = 0.940), with moderate agreement for double support time (ICC = 0.752, CCC = 0.477). Agreement remained consistent across vibration conditions in both groups. The NUSHU system demonstrates acceptable validity for stride length, stride time, and velocity under both measurement and active feedback modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.