ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cyber-Physical System Integration of IoT Sensing and Machine Learning: A Cross-Domain Review of Decision Support and Control in Smart Buildings and Precision Agriculture.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new generation of smart buildings and precision agriculture is evolving through the integration of cyber-physical systems (CPS), which combine IoT sensors with machine learning (ML). As such, there is an implicit assumption made by researchers in most of these studies that the ML component represents the decision making mechanism within the overall system. Furthermore, most researchers do not articulate the full scope of the cyber-physical feedback loop linking prediction outputs, operational decisions based upon those predictions, actual actuation of the physical plant or farm operation, and subsequent performance evaluations. The outcome of this paper brings out transferable decision support patterns across domains such as the mechanisms which have proven to be effective in scenarios with low number or quality of data measurements. Specifically, we present a review for two CPS domains that benefit intensely from decision support: smart buildings and precision agriculture. We examined how sensing, data processing, ML, and control modules are combined in practice when creating decision support applications. This resulted in a review of the literature to identify architectural patterns, decision objectives, and feedback mechanisms in both domains. This combination insight paves the way for more flexible and more effective decision making applications compatible with different domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.