ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Reconstruction-Driven Induction Thermography for AI-Assisted Surface Defect Detection in Welded Structures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Welding is widely used to join steel components in energy storage systems, wind power generation systems, and transportation infrastructure. During service, surface defects in steel welds can promote rapid crack propagation and sudden fracture. To address this issue, this study presents an induction thermography framework for post-weld quality inspection of surface-breaking defects in welded steel structures. First, a yoke excitation structure was optimized and evaluated through numerical simulation and experimental validation, and its performance was compared with those of a straight coil and a three-loop coil. The results show that the yoke configuration maintains sufficient heating intensity in the weld region while improving the spatial uniformity of the thermal response. Furthermore, a speed-based reconstruction method was developed to reduce the effects of specimen motion and coil occlusion. By aligning thermal responses from the same physical locations in sequential thermograms, the method reconstructs a continuous temperature field over an extended inspection area. Consequently, the reconstructed images retain clear crack-related thermal features and provide stable inputs for automated analysis. In addition, DeepLabv3+, DSCA-UNet, and feature pyramid network (FPN) were used as representative segmentation models to evaluate the suitability of the reconstructed thermograms for automated defect extraction. On the current laboratory dataset, the three models achieved precision values of 90.4%, 88.6%, and 92.6%, respectively. These results indicate the potential of the proposed framework, while further validation with larger datasets and natural weld defects is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.