ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Single-IMU Wearable System with 1D U-Net for Knee Adduction Moment Waveform Reconstruction During Gait.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Marathon Running Transiently Causes Medial Meniscus Extrusion: Recovery Time Course and Factors Associated With Extrusion.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The knee adduction moment (KAM) is an important biomechanical marker of medial knee joint loading, but conventional assessment requires laboratory-based motion analysis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an improved inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based KAM estimation system that incorporates a one-dimensional U-Net (1D U-Net) with a gated recurrent unit (GRU) bottleneck. Gait data from 50 participants were used for model development and internal evaluation, and an independent holdout dataset collected using the same study protocol included 45 participants. Simultaneously recorded IMU signals and reference KAM obtained from motion capture-based inverse dynamics were used for training and evaluation. The model used a single IMU attached to the tibial tuberosity to reconstruct the KAM waveform during the stance phase. For peak KAM, Pearson's r values were 0.819, 0.602, and 0.621 for the training, internal validation, and holdout datasets, respectively. For KAM impulse, the corresponding values were 0.941, 0.744, and 0.745. These findings indicate that a simplified wearable system combining a single tibial IMU with a 1D U-Net incorporating a GRU bottleneck can reconstruct the KAM waveform during walking and derive clinically relevant parameters from it. Although further improvement in prediction accuracy is required, this framework may provide a practical basis for simplified screening or monitoring of medial knee loading in settings closer to routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.