Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515300›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Role of Testing and Characterization in the Methodical Development of Sensor-Integrating Bolts for Multi-Axial Force Measurement.

Julian Peters, Klaus Rappenecker, Fabian Deeg, Felix Herbst, David Riehl, Dirk Leiacker, Mario Kupnik, Klaus Hofmann, Sven Matthiesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julian PetersInstitute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4977-2605
Klaus RappeneckerInstitute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Fabian DeegInstitute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-1565-734X
Felix HerbstMeasurement and Sensor Technology Group, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-3691
David RiehlIntegrated Electronic Systems Lab, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-7447
Dirk LeiackerIntegrated Electronic Systems Lab, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-4667-3584
Mario KupnikMeasurement and Sensor Technology Group, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2287-4481
Klaus HofmannIntegrated Electronic Systems Lab, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6675-0221
Sven MatthiesenInstitute of Product Engineering, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5978-694X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 551302077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensor-integrating bolts offer a promising solution for in situ data acquisition by integrating sensory functions into existing machine elements. The standardized mechanical interfaces and performance must be maintained in order to ensure widespread use and retrofitting, which leads to a conflict of objectives between mechanical and sensory performance. The state of the art lacks multi-axial force-measuring bolts that meet these objectives. Therefore, we present a methodical approach that develops evolving prototypes of sensor-integrating bolts and applies testing activities to characterize the bolts' performance and gain knowledge to further improve the prototypes. Strain gauges and a specifically developed electronics platform for data acquisition with a BLE interface are used. The prototypes are tested for axial and bending loads. Mechanical and sensory performance indicators are investigated, such as von Mises stress increase, linearity errors, hysteresis errors and sensitivity. The characterization results of the testing activities and the knowledge extracted from each iteration concerning aspects like strain gauge type and position or sensor body integration and their influence on the performance indicators are shown. Overall, the prototypes improved the linearity error from 3.3% to 1% (axial) and 3.7% to 0.1% (bending). The error is below 6% and sensitivities are around 10 µV/V/kN (axial) and 1 µV/V/Nm (bending). The integration of the measurement chain reduces the mechanical performance within a range of 1.3% to 24.6%, underlining the conflict of objectives. Measures for compensating the reduction need to be taken, such as increasing the bolt's strength. Moreover, the measurements indicate that bending torques are superposed, even in axial load cases, making investigations of the effect on loadability necessary.

Indexed as

errorforcefunctional behaviorhysteresisintegrated measurementlinearitymachine elementsensitivitystrain gaugestructurally integrated sensor

Identifiers

PMID42515300
PMCPMC13417087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.