ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Role of Testing and Characterization in the Methodical Development of Sensor-Integrating Bolts for Multi-Axial Force Measurement.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensor-integrating bolts offer a promising solution for in situ data acquisition by integrating sensory functions into existing machine elements. The standardized mechanical interfaces and performance must be maintained in order to ensure widespread use and retrofitting, which leads to a conflict of objectives between mechanical and sensory performance. The state of the art lacks multi-axial force-measuring bolts that meet these objectives. Therefore, we present a methodical approach that develops evolving prototypes of sensor-integrating bolts and applies testing activities to characterize the bolts' performance and gain knowledge to further improve the prototypes. Strain gauges and a specifically developed electronics platform for data acquisition with a BLE interface are used. The prototypes are tested for axial and bending loads. Mechanical and sensory performance indicators are investigated, such as von Mises stress increase, linearity errors, hysteresis errors and sensitivity. The characterization results of the testing activities and the knowledge extracted from each iteration concerning aspects like strain gauge type and position or sensor body integration and their influence on the performance indicators are shown. Overall, the prototypes improved the linearity error from 3.3% to 1% (axial) and 3.7% to 0.1% (bending). The error is below 6% and sensitivities are around 10 µV/V/kN (axial) and 1 µV/V/Nm (bending). The integration of the measurement chain reduces the mechanical performance within a range of 1.3% to 24.6%, underlining the conflict of objectives. Measures for compensating the reduction need to be taken, such as increasing the bolt's strength. Moreover, the measurements indicate that bending torques are superposed, even in axial load cases, making investigations of the effect on loadability necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.