Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515289›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Effect of Center Determination Method, Point Cloud Filtering and Cross-Section Type on the Accuracy of Tree Stem Volume Estimation Using Laser Scanning.

Patrik Kúdela, Matej Ján Dominka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrik KúdelaNational Forest Center, Science and Research Division, Department of Forest Policy, Forest and Game Management, T. G. Masaryka 2175/22, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia.
Matej Ján DominkaNational Forest Center, Science and Research Division, Department of Forest Policy, Forest and Game Management, T. G. Masaryka 2175/22, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia.

Funding

European Commission 101059552European Union 09I01-03-V04-00095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static laser scanning is an advanced approach to timber volume estimation whose accuracy now matches or exceeds that of traditional forestry methods for volume estimation, enabling its practical application in woodworking management. This study evaluates how stem volume estimation accuracy from point clouds is affected by stem surface condition (with and without bark), cross-sectional area calculation methods, point cloud filtering, and stem center determination. Results show that the stem surface condition fundamentally controls the direction and magnitude of systematic errors. For stems with bark, the cross-sectional area derived from the squared diameter caused systematic volume underestimation, which increased after filtering, whereas the quadratic mean diameter led to overestimation that was substantially reduced by filtering and approached reference values obtained from computed tomography. For debarked stems, the squared diameter method produced systematic overestimation that was effectively mitigated by filtering, while the quadratic mean diameter resulted in persistent overestimation. The volumetric method itself had only a secondary influence on accuracy. Volume estimation accuracy was primarily governed by cross-sectional area formulation and stem surface condition. For logs with bark, the squared arithmetic mean radius produced systematic volume underestimation that increased by approximately 1% after filtering, whereas the quadratic mean radius overestimated volume by about 2% after filtering. For debarked logs, volume overestimation decreased from 4.05-4.72% to 1.57-1.80% after filtering when using the squared arithmetic mean radius, while overestimation remained high (6.55-6.92%) when the quadratic mean radius was applied. In contrast, the choice of volumetric method and center determination affected volume estimates by less than 1%. These findings confirm the high potential of static laser scanning and emphasize the need for point cloud-adapted computational models.

Indexed as

computed tomographylaser scanningpoint cloudvolume calculation

Identifiers

PMID42515289
PMCPMC13417207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.