ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Real-Time Localization of Magnetic Target Using Second-Order Scalar Magnetic Gradients.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic anomaly generated by magnetic target is widely used in many areas. In this paper, a real-time magnetic target localization method based on second-order scalar magnetic gradients at the closest point of approach (CPA) is proposed. By exploiting the geometric symmetry of the magnetic anomaly field at the CPA point, closed-form expressions of the target position and magnetic moment are derived directly from the second-order spatial derivatives of scalar magnetic anomaly under the induced-magnetization assumption, thereby avoiding iterative global optimization. Furthermore, a residual-based error index is constructed to evaluate the consistency between measured and reconstructed second-order scalar magnetic gradients, enabling automatic determination of the CPA point during platform motion. The proposed method is validated by the experiment. The results show that the CPA point on the trajectory can be accurately identified using the proposed error index, and the localization accuracy is significantly improved near the CPA point. At the CPA point, the relative errors of the estimated distances and angles between the target and the two sensors are 0.89% and 0.38%, and 1.0% and 0.52%, respectively, while the relative error of the estimated magnetic moment magnitude is 4.85%. Therefore, the proposed method has great value in target localization based on a mobile magnetic anomaly detection system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.