ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Waveform-Level Validation of Continuous Shank-to-Vertical Angle Measurement Using a Wearable Posture Sensor with Independent Video-Based Gait Event Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate evaluation of the shank-to-vertical angle (SVA) is important for optimizing lower-limb alignment during gait, particularly during ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) tuning. This study investigated the validity of a wearable posture sensor for continuous SVA measurement during walking using an optical motion capture system as the reference standard. Nine healthy adults participated, and 88 gait cycles were analyzed. SVA was measured using a shank-mounted wearable sensor and a three-dimensional motion capture system. Gait events for the wearable sensor were identified independently using synchronized tablet-based video recordings rather than inertial signals. Agreement was evaluated at the gait-cycle and participant levels using waveform correlation, mean bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis. Across the full gait cycle, the trial-level waveform correlation was 0.935 ± 0.064 and the RMSE was 9.74 ± 3.71°. During the individually identified stance phase (mean toe-off, 63.67 ± 1.78% of the gait cycle), waveform correspondence increased to 0.990 ± 0.010 and the RMSE decreased to 6.78 ± 3.51°. Participant-level estimates were similar. For SVA range, participant-level Bland-Altman analysis yielded a bias of -5.58° with 95% limits of agreement from -14.01° to 2.86°, and repeated-measures analysis produced similar estimates. Temporal error analysis showed smaller and more stable deviations during the majority of the stance phase than during swing, with larger deviations in late swing. These findings support the potential use of the wearable posture sensor as a targeted tool for stance-phase SVA assessment, although further validation of pathological gait and actual orthotic tuning is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.