Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42515227›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Motion-Driven Automatic IMU Orientation Calibration via

Anik Sarker, Alan T Asbeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anik SarkerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-7409
Alan T AsbeckDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5589-7797

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation 2014499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calibration of body-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs) is essential for accurate motion estimation, yet sensor orientations may drift over time due to slippage or long-term integration errors. This causes an IMU to gradually lose alignment with the body segment on which it is mounted. In this paper, we develop a novel technique for Automatic Calibration-recovering this alignment during normal motion, without a dedicated calibration step. We implement automatic calibration by formulating it as the alignment of motion-induced orientation distributions on SO(3). When the activity being performed is known (e.g., walking), the distribution of orientations for a correctly calibrated IMU exhibits a characteristic and repeatable pattern on SO(3). Although sensor drift may rotate this distribution into a different orientation, the underlying pattern remains similar. Thus, we calibrate a drifted IMU by aligning its observed orientation distribution to a prior reference distribution obtained from the same activity, either from the same subject at an earlier time or from other subjects. To perform this alignment, we employ a correspondence-free spherical pattern matching method on SO(3) (SO3_SPMC), based on transformed basis vector distributions and spherical cross-correlation. We evaluate the proposed automatic calibration framework with N = 5 people wearing body-worn IMUs during activities of daily living, demonstrating calibration accuracy comparable to supervised single-frame calibration without requiring explicit calibration poses or user intervention. The activities of walking, typing, and using using a computer mouse were best for automatically calibrating a sensor on the wrist.

Indexed as

CalibrationWalkingAlgorithmsHumansMotioncoordinate frame alignmentIMU calibrationinertial measurement unitorientation distributionrotation pattern alignmentsensor-to-segment calibration

Identifiers

PMID42515227
PMCPMC13431329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.