ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Edge-Enabled Real-Time Gait Assessment for Degenerative Spinal Disease Using Wearable Inertial Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gait analysis is used in the diagnosis, rehabilitation, and longitudinal monitoring of degenerative spinal disease (DSD). However, conventional gait assessment commonly depends on subjective visual observation or laboratory-based motion-capture systems, which restrict accessibility and routine clinical use. This study presents an edge-enabled real-time gait analysis framework for DSD using two ankle-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs). The proposed framework integrates causal gait-event detection with spatiotemporal gait estimation, including stride length, stride height, stride frequency, and swing ratio, across Regular-, Toe-, Heel-, and Tandem-Walk tasks. To improve the stability of wearable gait estimation, the framework incorporates a cycle-wise initial sensor-orientation correction strategy with inter-cycle horizontal velocity continuity, reducing reliance on conventional zero-velocity update (ZUPT) resetting. A percentile-referenced, separability-weighted composite score was also developed to combine average gait performance, step-to-step variability, and gait asymmetry into an interpretable clinical index. Algorithm validation was conducted using an optical motion-capture system as the reference standard. The proposed framework, however, is intended for deployment using ankle-worn IMUs and edge-based computation without requiring optical cameras, reflective markers, or dedicated motion-capture laboratories during routine operation. Experimental results showed centimeter-level spatial estimation accuracy. The composite scoring framework achieved accuracy/F1-scores of 0.971/0.981 for Regular-Walk, 0.934/0.956 for Toe-Walk, 0.955/0.970 for Heel-Walk, and 0.876/0.919 for Tandem-Walk. Feature analysis indicated that stride length, stride frequency, swing ratio, and step-to-step variability provided the greatest discrimination between healthy controls and spinal patients, with stronger group separation observed in Regular-, Toe-, and Heel-Walk tasks. These results suggest that ankle-mounted IMU sensing combined with lightweight edge-based computation and interpretable gait scoring may provide a practical approach for point-of-care gait assessment and remote functional monitoring in DSD. The proposed system operates using only two ankle-mounted IMUs during routine deployment, while optical motion capture was employed exclusively as a laboratory reference for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.