ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temperature Effect on Residual Magnetic Field of Atomic Gyroscope Magnetic Shielding System: A High-Precision Modeling Method.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The residual magnetic field of the magnetic shielding system is a key factor limiting the bias stability of high-precision atomic gyroscopes. Due to the temperature dependence of hysteresis in soft magnetic materials, variations in ambient temperature can cause drift in the residual magnetic field inside the shielding cavity, thereby introducing measurement errors. Existing studies mostly rely on time-consuming finite element methods (FEM), which struggle to efficiently characterize the temperature-magnetic coupling effect. To address this issue, this paper develops a theoretical model for a fast solution. First, a static magnetic field analytical model for the multilayer cylindrical magnetic shielding system is established. Second, nonlinear magnetization theory is introduced to correct the calculation errors caused by the nonlinear variation in material permeability under weak fields. On this basis, an improved Jiles-Atherton (J-A) model incorporating a temperature correction factor is constructed to accurately characterize the magnetic field distribution inside the shielding system at different temperatures. The results demonstrate that the proposed analytical model can independently and rapidly predict the residual magnetic field distribution at different temperatures, without requiring any calibration or fitting based on FEM simulations. After accounting for hysteresis nonlinearity, the deviation of the shielding factor at the center point between the analytical model and FEM simulations is approximately 5%. The static residual magnetic field at the center point exhibits a negative correlation with temperature variation. Within the actual operating temperature range of the atomic gyroscope from -40 °C to 60 °C, the measured results agree with the model predictions regarding the temperature-dependent trend of the radial residual magnetic field. The relative deviation of the radial residual magnetic field ranges from 2.78% to 7.69%, and that of the axial residual magnetic field ranges from 7.94% to 14.47%, thereby verifying the accuracy of the theoretical model. This model effectively predicts the residual magnetic field drift law of the magnetic shielding system under varying temperature conditions and can provide theoretical support for the analysis and active compensation of thermally induced magnetic errors in atomic gyroscopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.