ReviewToxics2026
Antibiotics in the Environment: Occurrence, Enhanced Removal Strategies and Future Prospects.
Review in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread occurrence of antibiotics in the environment threatens public health and ecosystem safety. This review summarizes the global occurrence of antibiotic contamination across the different environmental media, i.e., water systems, solid wastes, and soils, and provides a comprehensive analysis of physical, chemical, and biological removal methods, including their mechanisms, application advantages and disadvantages. It is deduced that physical methods aid in antibiotic enrichment, which leads to residual accumulation and fails to achieve complete degradation. In comparison, chemical methods are more efficient and rapid, but they are largely limited by high costs and secondary pollution. Biological methods, despite being appealing due to their low costs and environmental friendliness, may generate and spread antibiotic-resistant bacteria. To overcome the disadvantages of these conventional treatment methods, this review emphasizes the significant potential of integrated antibiotic removal systems, such as coupled advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), physical methods combined with AOPs and chemical methods combined with biological methods, which could achieve superior treatment performance. Future research should focus on optimizing and simplifying coupled systems and developing innovative treatment methods to enhance removal efficiency, reduce operational costs, and minimize secondary toxicity, thereby enabling effective antibiotic pollution remediation. This review summarizes the global state of antibiotic residues and stresses the importance of combined treatment methods for enhancing antibiotic degradation and removal, providing the valuable insights for green and efficient antibiotic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.